Every capability in this report was verified against a primary source — vendor/manufacturer product pages where possible, supported by independent
trade press (Stone World, Stone Update / StoneMag) and review aggregators. Each claim carries an explicit maturity tag:
Shipping (real, deployed), Emerging (real but early/pilot, or unverified magnitude),
and Speculative (roadmap, stealth, or marketing-forward).
Two recurring corrections drove the framing. First, measurement precision is not AI: the dominant templating tools
(LT-2D3D laser, Prodim Proliner) are precision instruments whose vendors make no AI claims. Second, aggregator hype routinely outruns vendor claims —
third-party round-ups attribute "AI defect detection" to scanners whose own pages describe operator-driven marking. Where a number (15–30% yield, 98% accuracy, 30–50% cost cuts)
traces only to vendor marketing or SEO aggregators, it is flagged as unverified and not asserted as fact. Two Stone World articles returned HTTP 403 to direct fetch and were
sourced via indexed summaries rather than asserting unverified specifics.